Purpose Of Education How Children Interact With Their...

Purpose of Education The purpose of education is to help children learn core subject skills and mature into independent learners with responsibility and become leaders. Bruner cited in Driscoll (2005) focuses on â€Å"complex ideas and proposes that develop in children, as a function of an interaction within their environment and personal growth experiences† (Driscoll, 2005, p. 229). Bruner focus on how children interact with their environment, and personal experiences. For example, children like to initiate solving problems and conflicts about things in the classroom, like computers, bulletin boards, and textbooks. Children interact with knowledge, and they make suggestions about using the strategies to help them learn skills. Education has been immersed in conflict for decades. Dewey (1938) spent twenty years of experience teaching with the progressive schools and endured twenty years of criticism about his theories. He tried to raise a consciousness about conditions and insight into needed and desired changes. Many of the conflicts that surrounded education was the result of various points of view concerning the purpose of education, definition of knowledge, and arguments over which knowledge was more effective. In this paper, I will assume the position that the purpose of education is to enable individuals to achieve their full potential as leaders and members of society; this defines that these individuals will receive an education that will enable them to think and actShow MoreRelatedEducation Is The Goal Of True Education Essay1001 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education.† -Martin Luther King, Jr. Education is similar to poetry, in that no one person’s interpretation is quite the same. An author may have a meaning in mind, but it’s specific meaning is determined by the reader. Similarity, education’s meaning and purpose is determined by the individual, and is often different from person to person. For Martin Luther King Jr. education is not only about acquiring knowledge, but also about applying thatRead MoreThe Teaching Philosophy of Exceptional Children Essay869 Words   |  4 Pagesexceptional children: My teaching career has been spent learning how to provide appropriate support, guidance, patience, understanding, as well as to enhance academic growth success, for all students. My purpose as a teacher is to enrich and inspire the lives of young students with moderate/intensive needs by providing access to information instead of functioning as the primary source of information fo r students to flourish. My teaching methods will be to create an environment ripe with opportunitiesRead MoreEarly Childhood Education Essays1052 Words   |  5 PagesContributions 3 Personal Reflections 4 Bibliography 5 Introduction In this assessment I will be talking about the principles and philosophy of Frobel and Montessori, what they have in common and differences, there contributions to Siolta and my own thoughts in relation to early childhood education and their impact on the learning environment Principles and Philosophy Froebel believed that the kindergartens primary focus should be on play–the process by which he believed children expressed theirRead MoreMy Goal As A Teacher1367 Words   |  6 Pagesencourage children to be curious always wanting to expand their horizons to achieve more than they thought originally possible. My goal as a teacher is to be a positive influence that as adults my students can look back on and say I helped form their opinions on education and the power of knowledge. I see education as the most crucial piece of society and I think it is the responsibility of society as a whole to better the world of education, always pushing the next generation of children to do betterRead MoreEducation Reflection Paper983 Words   |  4 PagesEducation is the process of facilitating learning, or the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values and beliefs. Also Education is an enlightening experience. I ask myself, what’s the purpose of education? During this past year’s I have read and learned that the main purpose of education is to provide the betterment of each student for living morally, creatively and productively in a democratic society. One philosophical perspective that schools should implement is perrenialism. Perrenialism is theRead MoreMulticultural Curriculum For A Multicultural Classroom1425 Words   |  6 Pagesbut I was not aware of how important it was in a classroom setting. As the weeks have gone by in this class, I have learned th at multicultural curriculum is important because it s a way for teachers to include all children from diverse backgrounds. As we ve have progressed in the study of multicultural curriculum we have learned to address important topics such as biases, social justice, stereotypes, the development of identity and how to communicate with parents. The purpose of this paper is toRead MoreComputers and Ethics1540 Words   |  7 PagesSocial Networking Danielle Morris Professor Virginia Booth INF 103: Computer Literacy April 16, 2014 Communication is an inevitable occurrence in life and is vital to building and maintaining relationships. Individuals typically interact with family, friends, and colleagues regularly. Previously, landline phones and postal mail were popular methods of communication that individuals and businesses relied on. These venues were used to relay information, engage in transactions, and keep inRead MoreWhat Do You Think Of The Challenge For Children s A Socially Responsible People? Essay847 Words   |  4 Pagesthe challenge to help children learn to be socially responsible people? A.1. I agree that it was easier for children to grow as responsible adult in the society; times changed, everyone was helping in the house, and there was no stress of the technology that there is today, but Dewey is comforting worried parents to be prompt to use these changes for new learning opportunity, giving children real life experiences, encouraging experimentation and independent thinking. Q.2. How would you answer thisRead MoreChildren Of Secondary School Level, And The Process Of Referral Involved1415 Words   |  6 Pagesupon the work practice carried out in an Additional Support Needs education setting for children of secondary school level, and the process of referral involved. The report will demonstrate the support needs of an individual within the school and the common problems that may factor into the care and development of the child and how the school can support them, information detailing the strategies in place within the school and how staff within the school along with outer agencies collaborate togetherRead MoreAspects Of An Appropriate Inclusion Setting1442 Words   |  6 Pagesdisabilities in regular classrooms with their nondisabled peers, in the school they would attend if not disabled, to the maximum extent appropriate. There are still lots of controversial views in education as to how an inclusion setting is delivered, who is responsible, what makes this setting important and how to make it successful. When educator look at the definition of the work â€Å"Inclusion†, the laws clearly states â€Å"Inclusion is a term which expresses commitment to educate each child, to the maximum

Luis Sotelo. Mr. Ortiz. English 12. 27 February 2017. Macbeth

Luis Sotelo Mr. Ortiz English 12 27 February 2017 Macbeth vs Throne of Blood In â€Å"Tthe Tragedy of Macbeth† by William Shakespeare, there is a big focus on the character itself instead of the plot of the play. Each character is of high importance to the tragedy and the developing plot that leads to Macbeth’s downfall. Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, Banquo, and even minor characters such as the witches all mold and shape Macbeth’s fate and make it a tragic one. In the Throne of Blood (1957) by Akira Kurosawa, a reenactment of the play by Shakespeare, high value is also given to the character, as it is more important than the setting and events. Washizu (Macbeth), Asaji (Lady Macbeth), Miki (Banquo), and the forest spirit (three witches) display both†¦show more content†¦When Lordship is killed and Washizu heads to the castle to tell the news to Miki, he doesn t open the doors for Washizu and his men until they show the coffin with Lordship’s corpse. Miki, unaware of the truth, pushes the council to appoint his â€Å"honorable b est friend† Washizu as the new King. Miki is confident that Washizu will appoint his son Yoshiteru as heir to the throne once Washizu is King just like the prophecy promised. However, Washizu, believes Miki is out to spoil his plans so he sends a murderer to kill Mikki and Yoshiteru. (Throne of Blood) In the play, Macbeth orders two murderers instead of one to kill Banquo because Macbeth also believes that Banquo is too honest and too good of a man to not tell the truth or suspect that Macbeth is behind Duncan’s murder. (Shakespeare 367) Macbeth, once Banquo is killed and never makes it to dinner, sees his ghost sitting in his chair and begins to go insane. (3.4.47-107.) In the same way, in the movie, once Miki is killed his ghost appears and Washizu goes insane and Asaji has to tell the council he is drunk and order them to leave (Throne of Blood) In both pieces, it is easy to see that Macbeth (Washizu) is driven by ambition and greed, meanwhile Banquo (Miki) is honora ble and a good man making them foils of each other. When looking closely as the main characters, Macbeth (Washizu) and Lady Macbeth (Asaji), one will see that

The Positive Effect of Capital Punishment in Modern America Free Essays

Ronnie Kuester Dr. Borgmeyer Eng. Comp. We will write a custom essay sample on The Positive Effect of Capital Punishment in Modern America or any similar topic only for you Order Now II 30 Sept. 2010 The Positive Effect of Capital Punishment in Modern America â€Å"I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think that’s right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s lives† (Bush). Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in the American society and is also one of the topics most people feel very emotional about. Everyone feels that their views are correct because there are many pros and cons to either side. Although some people believe the risk of executing the innocent is too great, the use of capital punishment has greatly impacted our society in a positive way because of its deterring effect, economic benefits, and the prevailing of justice. The deterrent effect is definitely one of the biggest benefits to having capital punishment. When people have the knowledge that they could be executed for killing someone else it often turns them away from committing the murder. Tanner from Fort-Worth Star Telegram thinks that the deterrent effect has shown to prevent between three and eighteen murders(Wood 601). Most people in modern America have heard of the death penalty, yet they still commit the crimes that are punishable by death. Since people know about it and still do it, they are basically accepting the sentence, unless they are mentally ill and in which cause do not get sentenced to death. Naci Mocan’s study, from the University of Colorado, suggest that, â€Å"Statistical studies like his are among a dozen papers since 2001 that show capital punishment has deterrent effects†(Wood 602). Abolitionists argue that the deterrent effect is only estimates and are not actually proven to deter murders. However, knowing, through many studies, that three to eighteen innocent people could be saved by executing each convicted killer greatly outweighs the benefits to letting the murderer off the hook. Although, the deterrent effect is the greatest benefit to having capital punishment, the economic problem is also very important. A suggested alternative to the death penalty is life in prison without parole. This upsets many of the taxpayers, as it should. An article in The Economist states, â€Å"the idea of spending public money to feed and clothe murderers for the rest of their lives seemed outrageous†(Economist 605). Is there a difference to sentencing life in prison or executing someone? In the end they die a captive man. It is delaying the inevitable, but not many people see that. It is not very fair giving man his freedoms after he has taken the lives of others. He himself has not respected the life and liberty that all people should have. Once you take away someone’s life yours should be taken in return. That is, only if it is murder in the first degree and the murder was committed intentionally. After being sentenced to life without parole their court dates are not done. Money keeps getting wasted in the courts after the sentencing. Most convicts are still trying to get a reduced sentence or get parole. Convicts going through trials for the death penalty and life in prison often have to wait a very long time, which in the process is spending a lot of the tax payers’ money. Either way, life in prison or the death penalty on average they wait a decade before a decision is made or the execution is carried out. Other than deterring crime and being economically beneficial, capital punishment also allows justice to prevail. Justice seems to always prevail, but in some instances, this is not the case. However, no innocent human has been executed through the use of DNA testing. Only the convicts who commit the worst, most heinous of crimes are even put on death row. Abolitionists see that the government is just killing someone. However, like the quote at the beginning, the government does not have the death penalty just to seek revenge. That is not what the death penalty is about. It is about justice being served and letting people know that murdering will not be acceptable. The government does not execute people to flaunt its power, Foucault agrees when he states, â€Å"It is ugly to be punishable, there is no glory in punishing†(Foucault 10). It is because of this that America, along with many other nations, has done away with torturing as well. The government does respect points of the abolitionists saying it is not right torturing the convicts or causing extreme pain. They have changed their ways making the execution more humane. In our modern society we do not torture death row inmates anymore. Foucault states that, â€Å"today we are rather inclined to ignore it; perhaps, in its time, it gave rise to too much inflated rhetoric; perhaps it has been attributed too readily and too emphatically to a process of ‘humanization’, thus dispensing with the need for further analysis†(Foucault 7). It was thought that torture was a corrective procedure that if they were tortured they would not commit the crime again. However, it is viewed as inhumane to inflict pain on an individual to teach them discipline, especially if they are being put to death anyway. So now we use more humane ways to put people to death that involve little to no pain. Lethal injection is the most modern and safe way to put someone to death. It was first used in 1977 in Oklahoma but took five years before it was used on someone. All of the states except one that have the death penalty use lethal injection. The inmate being executed is bound down and has his heart being monitored. Then, they insert two needles into the veins injecting the inmate with Sodium Thiopental. This is an anesthetic which renders the inmate unconscious. â€Å"Next flows pavulon or Pancuronium Bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and stops the inmate’s preathing. Finally, the flow of potassium chloride stops the heart. Death results from anesthetic overdoes and respiratory and cardiac arrest while the condemned person is unconscious† (Methods). This technique used does not hurt the inmate, which is one of the reasons abolitionists are upset about the death penalty. As for any other method, they get pretty painful and or messy. Death by electrocution, hanging, and gas chamber are all extremely painful and do not kill the inmate right away. Not only does justice prevail through the government when someone is executed but also people get a religious satisfaction. The Bible specifically states that the death penalty is alright. Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man†(Genesis 9:6). The reason why it is believed people should be executed for killing another human being is because we were made in God’s image and destroying or killing that is major offense to God. The Bible also informs its readers that none shall take ranso m or money in exchange for the murderer’s life. This is where the justice comes into play. God does not want the government taking money in exchange for someone’s life. In modern day terms it would be equivalent to posting bail or just receiving a fine. That would be unrealistic to do in the case of a murderer being put to death. Abolitionists believe that we should not play God and only those who have not sinned be the ones to judge and â€Å"cast the first stone† so to speak. What most do not realize is that, according to the Bible, God thinks that these murderers should be killed. God is not going to just smite them down. Humans figured out and have interpreted the Bible and it’s meanings when saying these things about the death penalty. Most abolitionists greatest problem with the death penalty is executing the innocent. Executing the innocent is extremely rare. Hundreds of people have been released from death row due to DNA testing proving their innocence. This does not mean that they were executed. It is excellent that these people were not wrongly executed and it is because of modern technology that it can be appreciated. However, executing those who have been, without a doubt guilty of committing murder in the first degree should be executed. Throughout the use of DNA testing to possibly help the case of either side, there have been zero cases where and innocent human has been executed. Abolitionists keep seeing that the death penalty is still used despite the way they feel. So they begin to say things like, â€Å"Killing a murderer does not bring his victim back to life. It achieves nothing but the death of still another person†(Robinson). As stated at the beginning of this paper, by having the death penalty be legal it deters certain crime, has economic benefits, and it allows justice to be served. No matter what abolitionists are doing, most of their ideas keep getting shot down. There is a reason the majority has always sided with the death penalty, because it just helps out our modern American society. Works Cited Bush, George W. â€Å"Presidential Debate† Washington University Athletic Complex. University of St. Louis. 17 Oct. 2000. Speech. â€Å"Descriptions of Execution Methods. † Deathpenaltyinfor. org. Death Penalty Information Center. Web. 22 Sept. 2010. . Foucault, Michel. â€Å"Chapter 1. † 1979. Discipline and Punishment. Trans. Alan Sheridan. 3-18. Print. King James Version Bible. Genesis 9:6. 2004. Robinson, Bruce A. â€Å"Capital Punishment – the Death Penalty. † ReligiousTolerance. org by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 04 Aug. 2007. Web. 22 Sept. 2010. . Wood, Nancy V. Perspectives on Argument. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009. Print. (601-613). How to cite The Positive Effect of Capital Punishment in Modern America, Papers